Diddy sex trafficking trial: Assistant testifies to forced labor

*The fourth week of

Sean “Diddy” Comb

’s sex trafficking trial began with intense testimony from his former personal assistant, known in court as “Mia.”

Mia claimed she was forced to work under abusive conditions and said she was part of a “criminal enterprise” directed by the music mogul. Her statements are key to the federal racketeering case against Diddy.

She told the court it was hard to come forward because she had been “brainwashed” by Diddy. “I’m still untangling these things. I’m in therapy,” she said.

Prosecutor accuses defense of humiliating the witness

During the session, prosecutor

Maurene Comey

told the judge that defense attorney

Brian Steel

’s questions were sarcastic and aimed at embarrassing Mia.

Judge Arun Subramanian didn’t agree Mia was mistreated but warned Steel to stay focused in his questioning. He threatened to step in if Steel didn’t move on quickly.

Despite the judge’s rules, Mia’s face was accidentally shown on a video feed in an overflow room. Prosecutors couldn’t explain how that happened.

Mia explains texts, says she was “brainwashed” by Diddy

The defense pointed to old messages from Mia that showed affection toward Diddy even after her 2017 firing. Steel also highlighted texts where Mia expressed suicidal thoughts.

She replied that she didn’t lie and said she was emotionally trapped at the time. “My entire world was being ripped away from me immediately,” she said.

“Even, in hindsight, that world was awful. I didn’t know it at the time, so that’s why it felt like everything was ending.”

Beverly Hills Hotel exec testifies about Diddy’s secret aliases

Sylvia Oken, a hotel director, took the stand briefly to confirm Diddy had used fake names like “Phillip Pines” and “Frank Black” when staying at the Beverly Hills Hotel.

She mentioned there was damage linked to his stays, although she didn’t give much detail during this appearance. Her testimony supports claims of Diddy’s attempts to hide his identity during alleged illegal acts.

Juror reactions could sway the outcome of the trial

One female juror appeared entertained by Steel’s aggressive questioning of Mia, even smiling during the exchange. At other points, she looked skeptical.

This mixed reaction could affect how the jury ultimately sees Mia’s credibility. Jurors are human, and body language may reveal changing opinions.

Experts say this case will likely hinge on whether jurors see Mia as a victim or someone who could have walked away from a bad job.

Upcoming witnesses in Diddy’s trial may bring more revelations

On Tuesday (06-03-25), hotel security supervisor Eddy Garcia is expected to testify about Diddy’s alleged 2016 assault on then-girlfriend Casandra Ventura.

He appeared briefly today to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights, hinting at more legal risks. Another accuser, going by “Jane,” may also testify soon.

This case continues to unfold with dramatic turns and major legal implications for the music icon.

Why this Diddy trial testimony matters for abuse victims

Mia’s testimony raises a deeper question: Can a toxic job become as mentally trapping as an abusive relationship?

Millions of workers stay in harmful environments due to money, fear, or psychological manipulation. This case could highlight how power and control work in the workplace.

Whether jurors believe Mia was truly trapped or had options may decide Diddy’s fate in this federal case.


RELATED NEWS ON Big One News:

Snoop Dogg Dragged Online After Speaking Out on Diddy Trial | VIDEO


We Publish Breaking News 24/7. Don’t Miss Out! Sign up for our Free daily newsletter



HERE



.

The post

Week 4: Diddy’s Ex-Assistant Delivers Powerful Testimony in Sex Trafficking Trial | VIDEO

appeared first on

Big One News

.